Wapakoneta, OH
Tuesday, February 9, 2010

Advertisement
 
 
Advertisement
 
 
Search Archive
Advertisement

 
News
Home
Local News
Breaking News
National News
Business
Obituaries
Visitor Information
Weather
Horoscopes
Entertainment
Recipe of the Day
Sudoku
Lifestyles
Sports
Local Sports
National Sports
Advertisement
Classifieds
Place An Ad
Classifieds
Service Directory
Restaurant Guide
Make Us Your Homepage
Wapakoneta News
About Us
Contact Us
Subscribe
Advertising
Letters to the Editor
Submit Letter to Editor
Submit Announcement
Printing Services
Community Events
Community Events
February 2010
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28
Advertisement
Poll
Do you think
the high-speed
passenger train
is a good idea?
 
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
 
Snow hits, more to come

Image
Area residents used snowblowers, snow plows and snow shovels to dig out from a winter storm that hit late Friday and Saturday. Another storm is to hit tonight. Staff photo/William Laney
 

MIKE BURKHOLDER
and WILLIAM LANEY
Staff Writers
A winter snow storm, which dumped as much as 3 feet in the Washington, D.C. area, hit the area with as much as 9 inches of snow in Wapakoneta and some areas of Auglaize County.
The snowfall came with high winds which created drifts as tall as 4 feet causing hazards for the city and county roadways.
Wapakoneta weather observer Dan Dietz calculated 8.5 inches of snow fell in Wapakoneta Friday and Saturday. The National Weather Service is predicting as much as 10 more inches starting with a light snow at midnight with most of the snow falling throughout the day Tuesday before tapering off early Wednesday morning.
Wapakoneta Public Works Superintendent Meril Simpson said city crews hit the roads at 4 a.m. Saturday, but the high winds hampered their effforts.
Crews worked until 4:15 p.m.. Saturday and returned Sunday and worked from 7 a.m. to 1p.m. before heading back out early this morning.
“We are attempting to clear the roadways the best we can and we are dumping more salt and grit this time,” Simpson said this morning. “The temperature is still too cold for the salt to work, but if we get enough sun it may warm it up enough to help.”

 
Best Of Ads

HELP WANTED
Advertisement
Advertisement
Court affirms Mercer case
Tuesday, 19 May 2009
By MIKE BURKHOLDER
Staff Writer
Judges on the 3rd District Court of Appeals Monday affirmed the sentence of a Chickasaw man sentenced to more than two decades in prison for his role in the deaths of four Mercer County teens.
Judges upheld the 24-year prison term given to Nicholas Schwieterman, who was sentenced on four counts of involuntary manslaughter and one count each of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of drugs or alcohol and possession of drugs. Wapakoneta attorney John Poppe and Eric J. Allen argued the prison terms are cruel and unusually punishment — a violation of Schwieterman’s constitutional rights.
In their appeal, Schwieterman’s attorneys claimed the trial court violated his constitutional rights and erred in imposing consecutive, non-minimum sentences on the charges.
On March 15, 2008, Schwieterman apparently ran a stop sign and his vehicle collided with one carrying Jordan Diller, 19, of Maria Stein, Jordan Moeller, 18, of Celina, Jordan Goettemoeller, 19, of Maria Stein, and Bradley Roeckner, 19, of Celina. The four teens were pronounced dead at the scene.
The appellate judges rejected both arguments and affirmed the sentence imposed by Mercer County Common Pleas Judge Jeffrey Ingraham.
In their decision, they determined that the cruel and unusual punishment proportionality test is inapplicable to aggregate prison terms.
The judges also reviewed several cases Schwieterman’s attorneys cited in their appeal regarding unfair prison terms. The panel said the sentences in the case — six years for each of the fatalities — fall within the statutory range and cannot amount to cruel and unusual punishment.
“For a first-degree felony, a trial court may sentence an offender to three, four, five, six, seven, eight, nine or 10 years in prison,” the judges wrote. “The individual sentences of six years for each first-degree felony offense were within the valid statutory range.”
The judges also wrote that they found prison terms ranging from five to 10 years in first-degree involuntary manslaughter cases.
In overruling the second assignment of error, the judges wrote that the trial court did not fail to discuss recidivism or mitigation during the sentencing hearing. The judges cited entries made at the hearing detail statements made by Schwieterman as well as witnesses on his behalf.
“The record is clear that the trial court did consider those factors,” the judges wrote. “The court also acknowledged the receipt of a box of hundreds of cards and letters of support and encouragement sent to and received by the defendant during the pendency of this case.”
Mercer County Prosecuting Attorney Andy Hinders and Assistant Prosecuting Attorney Matthew Fox issued a written statement on the opinion.
“The unanimous decision of the 3rd District Court of Appeals affirms the 24-year prison sentence imposed by the trial court for Mr. Schwieterman, validates that the trial court properly exercised its discretion when it sentenced Mr. Schwieterman,” the statement said. “And helps to protect Ohioans from Mr. Schwieterman and those like Mr. Schwieterman who continue to drink alcohol and abuse illegal drugs and then choose to operate motor vehicles on Ohio’s streets and highways.”
Poppe said he is not surprised by the ruling in the case given the stipulations in the initial case.
Despite the ruling, Poppe said he is willing to go to federal court in Schwieterman’s defense.
“We anticipated that when the prosecutor made it a condition of the plea bargain that no factual issues could be appealed, only the issue of sentencing,” Poppe said. “That being the case, that doesn’t change the basic concept that we believe Nick Schwieterman is an innocent man. We are absolutely prepared to go that far, I don’t see any reason not to.”
A motion is currently pending in Mercer County Common Pleas Court requesting a hearing to review evidence in the case. Poppe said no matter the outcome of the request, he expects the issue to end up in the 3rd District Court of Appeals.
“Nick Schwieterman is a person who is wrongfully incarcerated,” Poppe said. “If he Ingraham grants a hearing, fine. On the other hand, if the judge denies it, we will be back in the Court of Appeals and Ohio Supreme Court in order to get to a federal court.”
Last Updated ( Wednesday, 20 May 2009 )
 
< Prev   Next >
AP Online Video Network

Advertisement
 
Advertisement
Advertisement
 
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Click for Hot Products
Free Apple iPad
Free Nintendo Wii
   

Copyright © 2010 The Wapakoneta Daily News
The copyright laws prohibit any copying, redistributing any copyright-protected material.
Powered by TriCube Media