Skip to main content

Capt. demoted: Dishonesty insubordination alleged after investigation

March 27, 2012

Tom Stinebaugh

City administrators demoted a Wapakoneta Fire Department captain alleging “dishonesty” and a “failure to follow directives.”

The firefighter claims he is being disciplined for his inability to recall the exact  comments, times and dates he made comments to Wapakoneta City Council members as a private citizen and the fact his memory is faulty should not be constituted as “lying.”

Wapakoneta Safety-Service Director Bill Rains issued a letter on March 19 informing Tom Stinebaugh, who was hired Nov. 15, 1992, and promoted to captain Jan. 13, 2006, that he was demoted from a captain-emergency medical technician (EMT) to a firefighter-EMT effective immediately. After being placed on paid administrative leave Feb. 27, Stinebaugh was told to report to work at 7 a.m. March 25 as a firefighter.

In the letter, Rains said he reviewed all the evidence including items submitted by the city and the union as well as Stinebaugh’s personnel file. Rains conferred with Fire Chief Kendall Krites regarding a predisciplinary conference held with Stinebaugh on March 16.

“A captain in the fire department must be a role model to other employees, a leader to firefighters and trustworthy to the fire chief and the department,” Rains wrote in the letter after talking with Krites. “Your performance as a captain has not indicated these qualities as indicated by your performance evaluations as a captain and this most recent investigation. While you are not expected to always agree with everyone, you are expected to be honest and to follow directives. Not only is dishonesty unacceptable, but your failure to follow directives cannot be permitted.”

On Monday, Rains said an investigation into the action and behavior of Stinebaugh was conducted and it was determined “he acted inappropriately in regard to our policies and procedures and he was demoted.” He noted during an investigation a city employee “cannot not tell the truth.”

The safety-service director had Police Chief Russ Hunlock conduct the investigation.

Krites said in a telephone interview Monday the disciplinary action started with him and extended to Rains. He noted the senior firefighter on Stinebaugh’s shift would be acting captain until a promotional exam can be given and a firefighter promoted.

Stinebaugh has filed a grievance with the safety-service director to review the case and Stinebaugh is waiting for Rains’ reply.

Stinebaugh told the Wapakoneta Daily News he believes the investigation centers on him talking with three members of Wapakoneta City Council regarding his concerns with the city purchasing a new pumper-heavy rescue vehicle costing more than $500,000. He said he also voiced those concerns with other firefighters and with Krites.

“I felt it was not an efficient use of the taxpayers’ money at this time and the way the economy is,” Stinebaugh said. “I believe people should be concerned and the purchase concerned me.

“I am just looking at the need right now for this new vehicle,” he said. “What I wanted them to do was the same thing, to look at it the same way. Do we need this vehicle now, can we afford it now. I wanted them to do their due diligence. This is what the citizens are going to make them do.”

He said he was off-duty when he called and expressed his views with the three councilors including the councilor representing his ward. Stinebaugh lives in the 1st Ward and is represented by Jim Neumeier.

During the investigation, Stinebaugh said he had difficulty recalling the exact dates of the conversations he had with the councilors — a point of contention in the investigation.

“I just think there has to be a difference between purposefully lying to a person and not remembering the facts as they were,” Stinebaugh said.

If Rains does not reinstate Stinebaugh as a fire captain, the next step would be for Stinebaugh to seek a hearing before an arbitrator where both sides would present evidence and make arguments.

Comments

Fire Capt. Demoted

April 8, 2012 by RK (not verified), 2 years 24 weeks ago
Comment: 173

Very interesting that Capt. Stinebaugh was demoted for not remembering something that he did or said on his own time. It was not during the course of performing his duties.
Tom is an honest man of integrity. He does not lie. Does he forget? Yes. But I would probably have some memory issues too if I fell off a roof 30 years ago and fell on my head. In any case, Tom does not lie. I would trust him with my life, which is what we as citizens do with our firefighters.
I wish I could say I trust our city leaders the same way........
Speaking of city leaders...I think that is a play on words, because a leader is someone that is trusted, respected, and has integrity. In speaking with several city employees I don't think our "leaders" fall under any of those categories. Actually, it appears that we have several "leaders" that could actually be called "bullies", which is a pretty hot topic these days, considering the programs recently held at the High School and Middle School, and a segment on "60 Minutes". All I know is that when you manage through intimidation, it is not leadership, that is much closer to bullying.
One thing I know about Tom Stinebaugh. He has never backed down from someone trying to intimidate him, so I am confident he will not backdown from this.
My concern is what are the citizens of Wapak going to do. Do we as citizens sit back and allow our "leaders" to spend our money on things that are not necessary? Or do we hold these "leaders" accountable?

Demotion of fire captain

March 28, 2012 by houseboy (not verified), 2 years 25 weeks ago
Comment: 171

Sounds to me like the city administrators are up to their old tricks. Don't see it my way I will find some way to put the hurts on you.
GOOD LUCK, CAPTAIN!!!!!

Tom Stinebaugh

March 27, 2012 by cville (not verified), 2 years 25 weeks ago
Comment: 170

As I see it he did no wrong he was acting as a concerned taxpayer of the city of Wapakoneta. He was not on duty which means he is a citizen and not a city employee. The investigation by the police is a waste of taxpayers' money and time when there was no criminal charges filed. It should have been handled by the fire chief only. Tom was only looking out for the taxpayers. Sounds like to me his the city violated his freedom of speech. If he is not reinstated, hope he sues.

The Wapakoneta Redskins were sound in all phases of Friday’s game, as they rolled to a 38-6...
McGUFFEY — Friday’s game against Upper Scioto Valley was not the way the Waynesfield-...
The Wapakoneta Redskins varsity football team is really starting to enter the grind that is the...

 

Classified Ads

Premium Drupal Themes by Adaptivethemes